More samples – less variability (for Cmax) [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2017-05-23 16:31 (2970 d 05:39 ago) – Posting: # 17397
Views: 5,220

❝ Would be fun to simulate that. Makes a nice paper.


...same thought here, thought about reviving my old "S-plus" files with "retro-NONMEM" sim approach to study influence of analytical variability on parameters estimates in BE-trials :-) But no time for the next months.

Have a special compound here, as some percentage of volunteers simply end up with low exposure, apparently nobody (no, not me...) knows why. Would be the classical situation were more samples is only more $$$, no better data, or? ;-)
—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,675 registered users;
55 visitors (0 registered, 55 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5