More samples – less variability (for Cmax) [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2017-05-23 16:31 (3323 d 08:06 ago) – Posting: # 17397
Views: 6,017

❝ Would be fun to simulate that. Makes a nice paper.


...same thought here, thought about reviving my old "S-plus" files with "retro-NONMEM" sim approach to study influence of analytical variability on parameters estimates in BE-trials :-) But no time for the next months.

Have a special compound here, as some percentage of volunteers simply end up with low exposure, apparently nobody (no, not me...) knows why. Would be the classical situation were more samples is only more $$$, no better data, or? ;-)

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
340 visitors (0 registered, 340 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5