Regulations ≠ Science [Study Assessment]
❝ I’m always happy to challenge regulatory practices. But in this case the chances to succeed are close to nil. IMHO, even trying is a complete waste of time. Alfredo will never, ever buy it.
Thanks Helmut!!
Complete thread:
- Study Results VSL 2015-04-20 21:46 [Study Assessment]
- Study Results ElMaestro 2015-04-20 23:47
- upper CL < PE Helmut 2015-04-21 00:39
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 00:24
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-21 16:49
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 17:12
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-22 15:47
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs Helmut 2015-04-22 16:41
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-22 15:47
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects Helmut 2015-04-21 17:12
- GMR outside the limits when using ABEL Averroes 2017-05-19 11:53
- Regulations ≠ Science Helmut 2017-05-19 14:07
- Regulations ≠ ScienceAverroes 2017-05-22 20:51
- Regulations ≠ Science Helmut 2017-05-19 14:07
- PE restriction for HVDs/HVDPs; testing effects jag009 2015-04-21 16:49
- Study Results ElMaestro 2015-04-20 23:47