Regulations ≠ Science [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-19 16:07 (2865 d 00:46 ago) – Posting: # 17373
Views: 7,473

Hi Averroes,

❝ […] the GMR constrant is there for political reasons more than for scienfic or statistical reasons.


Exactly. Suggested by Les Benet.

❝ Do you think we could still have an opportunity with European regulatory agencies?


I’m always happy to challenge regulatory practices. But in this case the chances to succeed are close to nil. IMHO, even trying is a complete waste of time. Alfredo will never, ever buy it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
12 visitors (0 registered, 12 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:53 CET (Europe/Vienna)

An expert is one who knows more and more
about less and less.    Nicholas Murray Butler

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5