Regulations ≠ Science [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-19 16:07 (2825 d 13:57 ago) – Posting: # 17373
Views: 7,399

Hi Averroes,

❝ […] the GMR constrant is there for political reasons more than for scienfic or statistical reasons.


Exactly. Suggested by Les Benet.

❝ Do you think we could still have an opportunity with European regulatory agencies?


I’m always happy to challenge regulatory practices. But in this case the chances to succeed are close to nil. IMHO, even trying is a complete waste of time. Alfredo will never, ever buy it.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,380 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,662 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:05 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Skill is a function of chance.
It’s an intuitive best-use of chance situations.    Philip K. Dick

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5