IMP handling [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-05-09 03:08 (2211 d 17:04 ago) – Posting: # 17330
Views: 29,066

Hi mittyri,

❝ I suppose the problem could be not in the case of 'significant separation in time' but in case of some mistakes in IMP handling.

❝ For example, RIMP has a proven stability up to 30C and TIMP up to 25 only. Due to some "why bother" attitude the designated employee missed it. As a result the second group will be treated with poor TIMP. I assume here that the order of groups treatment is





[image]That’s what I would call a “stacked approach”.
IMHO, not a good idea for single dose but might be necessary in steady state studies if the capacity of the clinical site is limited.

❝ The CRO's are usually mixing the time for groups for more effective time management.

[image]Yep – the “staggered approach” keeps the interval as short as possible.

60% of my data sets had an interval of less then seven days. In most of my single dose studies the interval was one to three days.

❝ So I think in case of appropriate IMP handling we wouldn't observe any real (not false-positive) interaction.


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,616 posts in 4,740 threads, 1,610 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz