IMP handling [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2017-05-09 01:40 (2328 d 00:41 ago) – Posting: # 17328
Views: 28,919

Hi Helmut,

I suppose the problem could be not in the case of 'significant separation in time' but in case of some mistakes in IMP handling.
For example, RIMP has a proven stability up to 30C and TIMP up to 25 only. Due to some "why bother" attitude the designated employee missed it. As a result the second group will be treated with poor TIMP. I assume here that the order of groups treatment is
The CRO's are usually mixing the time for groups for more effective time management.

So I think in case of appropriate IMP handling we wouldn't observe any real (not false-positive) interaction.
Please correct me if I'm wrong here.

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,627 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A refund for defective software might be nice,
except it would bankrupt the entire software industry
in the first year.    Andrew S. Tanenbaum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz