Pharmacokinetic metrics CL, Vd and F [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi,
No longer true.
BE guideline linked by Helmut was from 2005 and it was updated by CFDA in 2015 (as an appendix in Chinese Pharmacopeia 2015 Edition) and it's basically a copy of EMA's BE guideline (with some missing information). However, in 2016, they also published another BE guideline (3rd attachment, in Chinese), which is basically a copy from FDA's BE guidance. So it's a bit of mess now as you can imagine. e.g., FDA and EMA has quite different opinion about fasting and/or fed study for solid oral immediate-release dosage forms (depending on SPC's recommended administration method), in addition to many other aspects. Which guideline should one follow?
I recently helped to review a BE protocol in China and they follow the newer guideline. So FDA beats EMA in China so to speak.
. e.g., for the IR oral dosage I reviewed, instead of fasting BE only they will do both fasting and fed.
There are many other things to consider. One thing I'm sure is that all those parameters, or metric as Helmut prefer
, mentioned above are no longer required.
So MMW, I'd suggest that you talk to some guys in China to have updated info. before you do anything.
❝ As per the Guideline, for CFDA submissions, pharmacokinetic parameters CL, Vd and F needs to be submitted
❝
No longer true.
BE guideline linked by Helmut was from 2005 and it was updated by CFDA in 2015 (as an appendix in Chinese Pharmacopeia 2015 Edition) and it's basically a copy of EMA's BE guideline (with some missing information). However, in 2016, they also published another BE guideline (3rd attachment, in Chinese), which is basically a copy from FDA's BE guidance. So it's a bit of mess now as you can imagine. e.g., FDA and EMA has quite different opinion about fasting and/or fed study for solid oral immediate-release dosage forms (depending on SPC's recommended administration method), in addition to many other aspects. Which guideline should one follow?
I recently helped to review a BE protocol in China and they follow the newer guideline. So FDA beats EMA in China so to speak.

There are many other things to consider. One thing I'm sure is that all those parameters, or metric as Helmut prefer

So MMW, I'd suggest that you talk to some guys in China to have updated info. before you do anything.
—
All the best,
Shuanghe
All the best,
Shuanghe
Complete thread:
- Pharmacokinetic parameters CL, Vd and F mmw 2017-05-06 11:07 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Pharmacokinetic metrics CL, Vd and F Helmut 2017-05-06 12:14
- Pharmacokinetic metrics CL, Vd and FShuanghe 2017-05-08 16:16
- CFDA 2016 BE-GL Helmut 2017-05-09 13:52
- CFDA 2016 BE-GL Shuanghe 2017-05-10 13:03
- nonlinear PK: highest dose ⇔ strength Helmut 2017-05-10 15:17
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies d_labes 2017-05-10 15:41
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies Helmut 2017-05-10 15:45
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies d_labes 2017-05-10 16:20
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies Helmut 2017-05-10 16:28
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies d_labes 2017-05-11 16:31
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies mmw 2017-05-15 06:53
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies Helmut 2017-05-10 16:28
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies d_labes 2017-05-10 16:20
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies Helmut 2017-05-10 15:45
- highest dose ⇔ strength for dummies d_labes 2017-05-10 15:41
- nonlinear PK: highest dose ⇔ strength Helmut 2017-05-10 15:17
- CFDA 2016 BE-GL Shuanghe 2017-05-10 13:03
- CFDA 2016 BE-GL Helmut 2017-05-09 13:52
- Pharmacokinetic metrics CL, Vd and FShuanghe 2017-05-08 16:16
- Pharmacokinetic metrics CL, Vd and F Helmut 2017-05-06 12:14