Study costs: Replicate vs. 2×2×2 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mahmoud-teaima  – 2017-03-23 09:17 (2887 d 00:27 ago) – Posting: # 17178
Views: 25,131

Hi Helmut,

❝ Calculation of costs is complicated (fixed & variable costs, blahblah). In my CRO we had a spreadsheet with 100 rows… Had a quick look (19 samples / period, last sampling 16 hours; 2×2×2 in 42 subjects vs. 2×2×4 in 22). The replicate design would be ~4% cheaper. ;-) If you hope for RSABE (for CVwR 31% 18 subjects instead of 22 for ABE) the reduction in costs would be ~12%.


Can you please help me for in the approximate estimation of cost of bioequivalence study?, would you please send me the template sheet that you use for such calculations.

Greetings.

Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,664 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:44 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5