Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (2957 d 22:54 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 27,163

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.


Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,702 registered users;
26 visitors (0 registered, 26 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say.    William W. Watt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5