Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (2593 d 08:27 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 23,385

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.


Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,661 registered users;
95 visitors (0 registered, 95 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5