Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (2585 d 22:44 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 23,313

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.


Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,979 posts in 4,821 threads, 1,661 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never, never, never use any software!
Never, never, never trust any computer!    Detlew Labes

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5