Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (3037 d 06:34 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 31,629

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.


Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,684 registered users;
100 visitors (0 registered, 100 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5