Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (2266 d 06:38 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 21,891

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.

Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,614 posts in 4,740 threads, 1,609 registered users;
14 visitors (1 registered, 13 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

For every fact
there is an infinity of hypotheses.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz