GMR, theta 0 and that all [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-03-09 09:21 (1322 d 07:46 ago) – Posting: # 17144
Views: 10,295

Dear Silva,

» What is the meaning of "True ratio of T/R for simulating" and what is the difference for GMR?

To obtain a value of the type 1 error or the power via simulations one has to create data for many studies, say 1 Mio, perform the TSD framework (using GMR=0.95 f.i., the A in Helmut's schemes above) on that data and count all studies in which BE was decided.

To create the study data you use the "True ratio of T/R" and the "True CV" and the statistical distributions relating these parameters to the observed outcomes of a study.

True ratio = 1.25 will create studies which are under the Null hypothesis "bioinequivalence" and counting studies which decide here nevertheless BE gives you the type I error "Null hypothesis true but decided as false".

Hope this was understandable.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,173 posts in 4,412 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 6 (1 registered, 5 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 18:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

But it is in matters beyond the limits of mere rule
that the skill of the analyst is evinced.
He makes in silence a host of observations and inferences…    Edgar Allan Poe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5