GMR, theta 0 and that all [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-03-09 09:21 (1245 d 22:19 ago) – Posting: # 17144
Views: 10,088

Dear Silva,

» What is the meaning of "True ratio of T/R for simulating" and what is the difference for GMR?

To obtain a value of the type 1 error or the power via simulations one has to create data for many studies, say 1 Mio, perform the TSD framework (using GMR=0.95 f.i., the A in Helmut's schemes above) on that data and count all studies in which BE was decided.

To create the study data you use the "True ratio of T/R" and the "True CV" and the statistical distributions relating these parameters to the observed outcomes of a study.

True ratio = 1.25 will create studies which are under the Null hypothesis "bioinequivalence" and counting studies which decide here nevertheless BE gives you the type I error "Null hypothesis true but decided as false".

Hope this was understandable.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,969 posts in 4,374 threads, 1,461 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 08:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is a good morning exercise for a research scientist
to discard a pet hypothesis every day before breakfast.
It keeps him young.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5