GMR, theta 0 and that all [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-03-09 10:21 (3040 d 20:50 ago) – Posting: # 17144
Views: 14,762

Dear Silva,

❝ What is the meaning of "True ratio of T/R for simulating" and what is the difference for GMR?


To obtain a value of the type 1 error or the power via simulations one has to create data for many studies, say 1 Mio, perform the TSD framework (using GMR=0.95 f.i., the A in Helmut's schemes above) on that data and count all studies in which BE was decided.

To create the study data you use the "True ratio of T/R" and the "True CV" and the statistical distributions relating these parameters to the observed outcomes of a study.

True ratio = 1.25 will create studies which are under the Null hypothesis "bioinequivalence" and counting studies which decide here nevertheless BE gives you the type I error "Null hypothesis true but decided as false".

Hope this was understandable.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
44 visitors (0 registered, 44 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5