GMR, theta 0 and that all [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2017-03-09 10:21 (2602 d 07:10 ago) – Posting: # 17144
Views: 12,387

Dear Silva,

❝ What is the meaning of "True ratio of T/R for simulating" and what is the difference for GMR?


To obtain a value of the type 1 error or the power via simulations one has to create data for many studies, say 1 Mio, perform the TSD framework (using GMR=0.95 f.i., the A in Helmut's schemes above) on that data and count all studies in which BE was decided.

To create the study data you use the "True ratio of T/R" and the "True CV" and the statistical distributions relating these parameters to the observed outcomes of a study.

True ratio = 1.25 will create studies which are under the Null hypothesis "bioinequivalence" and counting studies which decide here nevertheless BE gives you the type I error "Null hypothesis true but decided as false".

Hope this was understandable.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,992 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,649 registered users;
70 visitors (1 registered, 69 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5