Data for 2nd stage of Potvin’s designs [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by BE-proff – Russia, 2017-02-18 06:40  – Posting: # 17078
Views: 10,614

Hi All,

I have some questions on Potvin's designs:;-)

1) is it correct that GMR and CV are required for sample size calculation for 2nd stage in all Potvin's designs?

2) Why Method C is considered "better" for sponsors than Method B?

The 1st question arised because Potvin's article dated 2007 says that only CV is needed for A and B while Method C uses both GMR and CV.

But on the other hand there are also opinions that all methods require GMR and CV.

Unclear....:confused:

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,135 posts in 4,245 threads, 1,386 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 23:46 CET

A Camel is a Horse designed by committee.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5