Impact of minimum stage 2 sample size on the TIE: example [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2016-12-30 17:19  – Posting: # 16913
Views: 3,906

Hi Helmut,

I am still lost, I must confess. Perhaps it is because I am not using the power2Stage package at all.

» I’ll give two examples. Both at the location (n1 12, CV 20%) of the maximum TIE.
» Simulating for power (at 0.95):
  1. No lower limit of n2
    » library(Power2Stage)
    » power.2stage(method="B", alpha=rep(0.0294, 2), CV=0.2,
    »              n1=12, GMR=0.95, targetpower=0.8, min.n2=0)

Should this not be min.n2=2 ? Or is it the "same difference"??

Do you think you have it in your heart to explain in slow motion to a dimwit like me who read your posts quite a few times which point you are trying to prove or investigating?

Otherwise I am afraid I will need to question you next time we meet f2f. And that might not be in the distant future :-D:-D:-D :pirate:

I could be wrong, but...
Best regards,
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,138 posts in 4,246 threads, 1,387 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 15:30 CET

The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is
that the stupid are cocksure
while the intelligent are full of doubt.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5