Impact of minimum stage 2 sample size on the TIE: example [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2016-12-30 18:19 (2960 d 15:22 ago) – Posting: # 16913
Views: 6,651

Hi Helmut,

I am still lost, I must confess. Perhaps it is because I am not using the power2Stage package at all.

❝ I’ll give two examples. Both at the location (n1 12, CV 20%) of the maximum TIE.

❝ Simulating for power (at 0.95):

  1. No lower limit of n2

    library(Power2Stage)

    power.2stage(method="B", alpha=rep(0.0294, 2), CV=0.2,

                 n1=12, GMR=0.95, targetpower=0.8, min.n2=0)


Should this not be min.n2=2 ? Or is it the "same difference"??

Do you think you have it in your heart to explain in slow motion to a dimwit like me who read your posts quite a few times which point you are trying to prove or investigating?

Otherwise I am afraid I will need to question you next time we meet f2f. And that might not be in the distant future :-D:-D:-D :pirate:

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,664 registered users;
197 visitors (0 registered, 197 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:42 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every system is perfectly designed
to get the results it gets.    Paul B. Batalden

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5