Not more than 2 sequences in full replicates [Design Issues]

posted by Mauricio Sampaio  – Brazil, 2016-11-11 19:39 (3517 d 02:50 ago) – Posting: # 16797
Views: 6,685

Hi Helmut...

❝ To clarify: By 4×2 do you mean RTRT|TRTR and by 4×4 RTRT|TRTR|RRTT|TTRR or yet another one (e.g., TRRT|RTTR|TTRR|RRTT)?


YES!!!!

❝ But: IIRC, in the late 1990 Donald Schuirmann argued against more than two sequences in full replicate designs. See also Appendix B of the FDA’s guidance.


Thank you so much. Really, 2 more sequences are a waste of time to prove a bioequivalence result! :cool:

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
371 visitors (0 registered, 371 guests [including 83 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5