PROC GLM fixes Subject [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2016-11-07 07:24 (3520 d 10:13 ago) – Posting: # 16783
Views: 27,611

Dear Mittyri and all,

❝ Are you working with Replicate study? The things are different there


Its a 2x2 crossover study.

❝ I think you can provide the SAS code above, so all experts will understand that all effects are still fixed, and the reason of random part there is just an F test.


proc glm data=replicate;
class formulation subject period sequence;
model logDATA= sequence subject (sequence) period formulation;
estimate "test-ref" formulation -1+1;
test h=sequence e=subject(sequence);
lsmeans formulation / adjust=t pdiff=control("R") CL alpha=0.10;
run;

This is Method A from EMA Q&A guidance. Ideally in GLM all effects are fixed.
Can we call here sub(seq) as a fixed effect?

Kumar Naidu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
366 visitors (0 registered, 366 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5