PROC GLM fixes Subject [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by kumarnaidu – Mumbai, India, 2016-11-07 07:24 (3166 d 15:50 ago) – Posting: # 16783
Views: 24,276

Dear Mittyri and all,

❝ Are you working with Replicate study? The things are different there


Its a 2x2 crossover study.

❝ I think you can provide the SAS code above, so all experts will understand that all effects are still fixed, and the reason of random part there is just an F test.


proc glm data=replicate;
class formulation subject period sequence;
model logDATA= sequence subject (sequence) period formulation;
estimate "test-ref" formulation -1+1;
test h=sequence e=subject(sequence);
lsmeans formulation / adjust=t pdiff=control("R") CL alpha=0.10;
run;

This is Method A from EMA Q&A guidance. Ideally in GLM all effects are fixed.
Can we call here sub(seq) as a fixed effect?

Kumar Naidu

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,694 registered users;
47 visitors (0 registered, 47 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If I’d observed all the rules,
I’d never have got anywhere.    Marilyn Monroe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5