Satterthwaite DF; SAS [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mathews – 2008-03-11 08:12 (6119 d 06:40 ago) – Posting: # 1675
Views: 15,008

Dear All,

One doubt regarding the above mentioned FDA recommended SAS code.

How can I include a SUB(SEQ) term in the above SAS code?

Why the covariance structure FA0(2) is used in this code? Why not the other covariance structures? Is there any method to choose the covariance structure?

Why DDFM=satterth? Why not DDFM=kenwardroger?

Regards

Matz

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,666 registered users;
37 visitors (1 registered, 36 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:52 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5