tmax results in R 3.3.1 and spss 20 on macos 10.11.6 [🇷 for BE/BA]
This is the results of tmax for my BE project from both R3.3.3 and spss20 on macos 10.11.6
from spss:
NPAR TESTS
/K-W=Tmax BY formulation(1 2)
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS.
NPar Tests
Syntax NPAR TESTS
/K-W=Tmax BY formulation(1 2)
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS.
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum
Tmax 48 1.1271 .50010 .50 3.00
treatment 48 1.50 .505 1 2
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Ranks
treatment N Mean Rank
Tmax ref 24 24.35
test 24 24.65
Total 48
Test Statisticsa,b
Tmax
Chi-Square .005
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .941
a Kruskal Wallis Test
b Grouping Variable: treatment
From R:
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of tmax
> ref = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2, 1, 1.5, 0.75, 1.5, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 1, 0.75, 1.5, 1, 3, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 0.75)
> test = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.8, 0.8, 1.5, 1, 1.5, 1, 2, 0.5, 1.5, 0.8, 1, 1, 0.8, 1, 1, 1, 1.5, 0.8, 0.8, 1, 0.8)
> dati = list(g1=ref, g2=test)
> kruskal.test(dati)
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test
data: dati
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 0.0054846, df = 1,
p-value = 0.941
Can anyone see a difference?
from spss:
NPAR TESTS
/K-W=Tmax BY formulation(1 2)
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS.
NPar Tests
Syntax NPAR TESTS
/K-W=Tmax BY formulation(1 2)
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS.
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum
Tmax 48 1.1271 .50010 .50 3.00
treatment 48 1.50 .505 1 2
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Ranks
treatment N Mean Rank
Tmax ref 24 24.35
test 24 24.65
Total 48
Test Statisticsa,b
Tmax
Chi-Square .005
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .941
a Kruskal Wallis Test
b Grouping Variable: treatment
From R:
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of tmax
> ref = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2, 1, 1.5, 0.75, 1.5, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 1, 0.75, 1.5, 1, 3, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 0.75)
> test = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.8, 0.8, 1.5, 1, 1.5, 1, 2, 0.5, 1.5, 0.8, 1, 1, 0.8, 1, 1, 1, 1.5, 0.8, 0.8, 1, 0.8)
> dati = list(g1=ref, g2=test)
> kruskal.test(dati)
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test
data: dati
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 0.0054846, df = 1,
p-value = 0.941
Can anyone see a difference?
—
Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.
Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.
Complete thread:
- ANOVA for lambdaz, half life and tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 11:03 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Egypt: Strange requirements Helmut 2016-07-20 12:25
- Egypt: Strange requirements mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 14:12
- Output is not from Phoenix/Winnonlin mittyri 2016-07-20 17:00
- ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-20 16:05
- ke versus t1/2 Helmut 2016-07-20 16:31
- ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-21 14:42
- “double“ testing Helmut 2016-07-21 14:54
- ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-21 14:42
- ke versus t1/2 Helmut 2016-07-20 16:31
- Egypt: Strange requirements mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 14:12
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-20 21:10
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 22:40
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-21 11:11
- tmax results in R 3.3.1 and spss 20 on macos 10.11.6mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-27 12:13
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-21 11:11
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 22:40
- Egypt: Strange requirements Helmut 2016-07-20 12:25