Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

ke versus t1/2 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-07-21 16:42 (3162 d 08:22 ago) – Posting: # 16510
Views: 10,167

Dear Helmut,

❝ ... Hence, testing both is nuts.

Totally correct IMHO. That'also my opinion. My concern was [nitpicking] "Any comparison will give identical variance, CI, etc." [/nitpicking].

But I must confess that I couldn't convince all sponsors I worked with of this opinion. Especially one from Upper-Bavaria was resistant.

Complete thread:

• ANOVA for lambdaz, half life and tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 11:03 [🇷 for BE/BA] 
  • Egypt: Strange requirements Helmut 2016-07-20 12:25
    • Egypt: Strange requirements mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 14:12
      • Output is not from Phoenix/Winnonlin mittyri 2016-07-20 17:00
    • ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-20 16:05
      • ke versus t1/2 Helmut 2016-07-20 16:31
        • ke versus t1/2d_labes 2016-07-21 14:42
          • “double“ testing Helmut 2016-07-21 14:54
  • tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-20 21:10
    • tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 22:40
      • tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-21 11:11
        • tmax results in R 3.3.1 and spss 20 on macos 10.11.6 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-27 12:13