Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • tmax in bear 2.7.7

tmax in bear 2.7.7 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2016-07-21 13:11 (3155 d 17:12 ago) – Posting: # 16509
Views: 10,252

Dear Mahmoud,

❝ ...

❝ Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of tmax ...

❝ Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 0.0054846, df = 1,

❝ p-value = 0.941

Great. much better than SPSS, right?

❝ waiting your advise on how to make the remaining statistical analysis of lambdaz and t1/2?

I guess the descriptive statistics for λz and t_1/2 should be good enough based on Egypt's BE GL, as mentioned previously by Helmut. I am not sure if the challenge was due to that you inappropriately submitted ANOVA for λz and t_1/2 to the regulatory before. If so, you may consider to remove ANOVA stuffs and just present descriptive statistics for λz and t_1/2.

—
All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

ANOVA for lambdaz, half life and tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 11:03 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Egypt: Strange requirements Helmut 2016-07-20 12:25
  - Egypt: Strange requirements mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 14:12
    - Output is not from Phoenix/Winnonlin mittyri 2016-07-20 17:00
  - ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-20 16:05
    - ke versus t1/2 Helmut 2016-07-20 16:31
      - ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-21 14:42
        
        “double“ testing Helmut 2016-07-21 14:54
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-20 21:10
  - tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 22:40
    - tmax in bear 2.7.7yjlee168 2016-07-21 11:11
      - tmax results in R 3.3.1 and spss 20 on macos 10.11.6 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-27 12:13