Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • tmax in bear 2.7.7

tmax in bear 2.7.7 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mahmoud-teaima – 2016-07-21 00:40 (3163 d 00:26 ago) – Posting: # 16506
Views: 10,287

thanks Yung-jin Lee for your reply,
here is the results of kruskal wallis test of tmax data performed in R 3.3.1 on macos 10.11.6 Elcaptin.

Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of tmax

ref = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2, 1, 1.5, 0.75, 1.5, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 1, 0.75, 1.5, 1, 3, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 0.75)

test = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.8, 0.8, 1.5, 1, 1.5, 1, 2, 0.5, 1.5, 0.8, 1, 1, 0.8, 1, 1, 1, 1.5, 0.8, 0.8, 1, 0.8)

dati = list(g1=ref, g2=test)

kruskal.test(dati)



   Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test



data:  dati

Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 0.0054846, df = 1,

p-value = 0.941

so no significant difference in tmax values between reference and test products.

thanks for your advise in that.

waiting your advise on how to make the remaining statistical analysis of lambdaz and t1/2?!!!!!.

Greetings.

—
Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.

Complete thread:

ANOVA for lambdaz, half life and tmax in bear 2.7.7 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 11:03 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Egypt: Strange requirements Helmut 2016-07-20 12:25
  - Egypt: Strange requirements mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 14:12
    - Output is not from Phoenix/Winnonlin mittyri 2016-07-20 17:00
  - ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-20 16:05
    - ke versus t1/2 Helmut 2016-07-20 16:31
      - ke versus t1/2 d_labes 2016-07-21 14:42
        
        “double“ testing Helmut 2016-07-21 14:54
- tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-20 21:10
  - tmax in bear 2.7.7mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-20 22:40
    - tmax in bear 2.7.7 yjlee168 2016-07-21 11:11
      - tmax results in R 3.3.1 and spss 20 on macos 10.11.6 mahmoud-teaima 2016-07-27 12:13