tmax in bear 2.7.7 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mahmoud-teaima  – 2016-07-21 00:40 (3125 d 20:09 ago) – Posting: # 16506
Views: 10,225

thanks Yung-jin Lee for your reply,
here is the results of kruskal wallis test of tmax data performed in R 3.3.1 on macos 10.11.6 Elcaptin.

Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test of tmax

ref = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2, 1, 1.5, 0.75, 1.5, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 1, 0.75, 1.5, 1, 3, 0.75, 0.75, 1, 0.75)
test = c(1, 0.5, 2, 0.8, 0.8, 1.5, 1, 1.5, 1, 2, 0.5, 1.5, 0.8, 1, 1, 0.8, 1, 1, 1, 1.5, 0.8, 0.8, 1, 0.8)
dati = list(g1=ref, g2=test)
kruskal.test(dati)

   Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test

data:  dati
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 0.0054846, df = 1,
p-value = 0.941


so no significant difference in tmax values between reference and test products.

thanks for your advise in that.

waiting your advise on how to make the remaining statistical analysis of lambdaz and t1/2?!!!!!.

Greetings.

Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,662 registered users;
238 visitors (0 registered, 238 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:50 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5