Log in
RegisterI would stop [Outliers]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2016-07-13 21:56 (2445 d 02:02 ago) – Posting: # 16488
Views: 18,544
Namaste ElMaestro,
I agree in general. But here we have after exclusion of subject #12 almost proven inequivalence (PE: 221%, lower 90% CL: 123.34%). The CVwR depending on the calculation method is >155%. One has to be an outstanding optimist to continue.
❝ why bother?
I agree in general. But here we have after exclusion of subject #12 almost proven inequivalence (PE: 221%, lower 90% CL: 123.34%). The CVwR depending on the calculation method is >155%. One has to be an outstanding optimist to continue.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Outliers in Replicated Crossover Study pash413 2016-07-11 09:04
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Which agency? Helmut 2016-07-11 12:56
- Which agency? pash413 2016-07-11 17:01
- Residuals and Critical value Calculation? pash413 2016-07-14 08:00
- Which agency? pash413 2016-07-11 17:01
- Outliers in Replicated Crossover Study DavidManteigas 2016-07-12 16:55
- Outliers in Replicated Crossover Study Ohlbe 2016-07-12 17:50
- Outliers in Replicated Crossover Study ElMaestro 2016-07-13 18:49
- I would stopHelmut 2016-07-13 19:56
- Outliers in Replicated Crossover Study pjs 2017-10-05 15:46
- Sample size for the FDA NTID BE decision d_labes 2017-10-05 17:25
- Which agency? Helmut 2016-07-11 12:56
Ing. Helmut Schütz