Relax! [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-06-28 16:24 (3189 d 05:06 ago) – Posting: # 16457
Views: 8,040

Hi Scientist fellow,

❝ I am awaiting for the response. Please let me know if somebody has come across similar incidence.


1st warning; see this post #5 and #9. Please follow the Forum’s Policy (see here and there).

Concerning your question: IMHO, most people would already consider your wording (using “culprit” four times) disproportionate. You suspect something without any hard evidence. Hearsay of other volunteers is completely irrelevant. According to all guidelines you could not remove the subject’s data (all BQLs in both periods) from the comparison without a clinical justification – which you don’t have.

PS: I neither experienced all BQLs in both (!) periods in 36 years nor did I ever hear about it from colleagues. Face it: shit happens.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:30 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5