Re-consenting volunteers? [Off Topic]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2016-06-23 10:23 (3299 d 20:27 ago) – Posting: # 16449
Views: 40,506

Hello Ohlbe,

❝ "These guys" in my sentence above did not refer to either the sponsor or Biotrial, but to the IGAS inspectors who perpetrated this report.


I have a funny taste in my mouse.

Is this all about a minister trying to acquit organisations under her command by using buddies from an incomp sorry I mean independent organisation to examine the role of the adminstrative bodies that originally handled the trial paperwork, and to place the responsibility elsewhere?



PS: Hey where did 'strikethrough' letters suddenly go?!? Hötzi, you naughty boy, have you been messing up the board again? *sigh* What shall we do with you?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5