Let's reconnect with the real world, please [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Scientist fellow – India, 2016-06-22 13:46 (3195 d 06:36 ago) – Posting: # 16439
Views: 8,195

We have online two times mouth check procedure and close post dose monitoring by custodian. So it is difficult to say that we could not identify suspicious behaviour of volunteer during his in house stay in both the periods. When we got information from bioanalytical lab that there is a BLQ found in all samples in both the periods in one volunteer (culprit) we started investigation. We tried to contact volunteer (culprit) however he himself did not turn up to discuss this event. Then we called other volunteers of the same study and other volunteer revelled that he had skill to hide the pill inside his throat (they used lay man language naturally) and he (culprit) discussed his skills with them (Other volunteers of the same study). Other volunteer also revealed that he (culprit) is working in diamond industry and involved in diamond polishing work. With the same skill he used to steal diamonds!!


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5 and follow the Forum’s Policy! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:23 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5