Re-consenting volunteers? [Off Topic]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2016-06-22 07:06 (3305 d 18:51 ago) – Posting: # 16435
Views: 40,711

Dear El Maestro,

❝ I am not a native French speaker but I think I sometimes understand a little bit of written French.


I am a native French speaker but there are a number of points in this report which I'm not getting either.

❝ Does the inquest into the Bial/Biotrial incident suggest that the volunteers should perhaps, possibly, maybe have been asked to re-confirm their consent after the initial SAE in their dosing group?


No, it does not suggest any such thing. It affirms it.

❝ Is there a French guideline or legal document specifically discussing re-consenting?


Not that I know of. Apart from the recent press releases of the Minister, of course :crying:.

If you want to practice your French, have a look at Biotrial's response to the initial inspection report. A "lost for lost", last pleasure kind of thing. You'll see for instance that in their initial report the inspectors made reference to a ministerial Order of 2006 on the notification of SAEs... which had been replaced by a new Order in April 2014. This gives some idea on how well these guys know and understand our laws and regulations governing clinical trials.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,673 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5