Biphasic: x=2 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-06-02 16:07 (3173 d 14:26 ago) – Posting: # 16381
Views: 3,074

Hi Maulik,

❝ As I understood, Cmax(x) denotes for an Immediate release phase of the formulation and Cmax(x+1) denotes for the modified release phase of the formulation.


In your case (biphasic), yes. The guideline deals with multiphasic formulations. Hhence, x>2 is possible.

❝ In addition to Cmax(0-2) & Cmax(2-t), shall I consider Cmax(total) [i.e. Cmax(0-t)] to demonstrate BE?


No. In my studies I only reported it.

❝ Based on the above discussion shall I keep below PK parameters to demonstrate BE?

❝ AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, partialAUC(0-2), partialAUC(2-t), Cmax(0-2), Cmax(2-t) & Cmax(0-t).


Exactly. Good luck for demonstrating BE of seven PK-metrics…


PS: If you crosspost (e.g., to David’s PKPD-list) link to this thread as well. Helps others “over there” to see what’s going on.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,665 registered users;
147 visitors (0 registered, 147 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5