Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-28 02:51 (3279 d 02:19 ago) – Posting: # 16368
Views: 31,975

❝ My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.


Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,683 registered users;
79 visitors (0 registered, 79 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5