Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-28 00:51 (1945 d 09:57 ago) – Posting: # 16368
Views: 24,166

» My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.

Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,693 posts in 4,535 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 4 (1 registered, 3 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 10:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Tortured data will confess to anything.    Fredric Menger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5