Compilation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-28 02:51 (2684 d 16:09 ago) – Posting: # 16368
Views: 27,991

❝ My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages. I would avoid NCSS; no idea how the calculation is done.


Jerry from NCSS reports the following:

We have looked into this and resolved it in our own minds. NCSS uses the Kenwood-Rogers method for degrees of freedom which is an extension of the Satterthwaite method.

This NCSS method is:

NCSS REML/extension of Saiterwaite B0 1.9414 (1.4849-2.3978); B1 0.7617 (0.6659-0.8576)
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,770 posts in 4,777 threads, 1,627 registered users;
10 visitors (0 registered, 10 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5