Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 13:22 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

doubts about NCSS [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-26 19:13  - Posting: # 16365
Views: 11,992

Hi Angus,

» Jerry from NCSS says that the default value is REML and it is Likelihood Type

OK; REML is a subset of maximum likelihood. Since in this post you reported 9.2 degrees of freedom for the intercept and 5.9 for the slope, why do NCSS’ 90% CIs not agree with the other packages (only the PEs)?
Maybe Jerry could register here instead of playing Chinese whispers. ;-)

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 10 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed