NCSS vs. PHX/WNL vs. SAS [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-17 03:50 (3259 d 10:18 ago) – Posting: # 16318
Views: 32,741

Hi Angus,

❝ I have repeated the above calculation in NCSS:

Intercept  1.9414  0.2496   0.000025 1.4849      2.3978      9.2
logDose    0.7617  0.0492   0.000005 0.6659      0.8576      5.9

Phoenix/WinNonlin:
           1.9414  0.2431   0.000020 1.4968      2.3860      9.2
           0.7617  0.0473   0.000004 0.6696      0.8539      5.9

Reported by Smith et al. (SAS Proc Mixed):
           1.94                      1.54        2.35
           0.7615                    0.679       0.844

Results by NCSS and Phoenix/WinNonlin are similar but don’t match SAS (whose CIs are wider). I love software.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,699 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say.    William W. Watt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5