Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 12:36 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Phoenix 64 Warning [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean - USA, 2016-05-15 20:11  - Posting: # 16309
Views: 13,172

» […] We cross-validated Phoenix/WinNonlin and SAS many times. […] I love “push-the-button” statisticians reporting a 0.1% CV (‼) without hesitation. How plausible is that? […]
» Body height can be measured pretty precisely. Ask the worker whether he/she thinks that repeated measurements can be done to ±1/16″. If the answer is yes, ask which variability he/she expects in AUFC.

Yes; we are still in 1/16" units here. They are difficult to work with. It is highly unlikely for 0.1% to be correct. Sometimes people will believe what they find to be the most favorable. I will be finding out more soon about the other data. Meanwhile I wonder if Pharsight can come up with a SAS comparison.

Meanwhile I am off to visit a German store "Aldi"

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,032 posts in 4,059 threads, 1,299 registered users;
online 20 (1 registered, 19 guests [including 13 identified bots]).

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that
something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
When he states that something is impossible,
he is very probably wrong.    Arthur C. Clarke

BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz