Phoenix 64 Warning [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-15 20:11  – Posting: # 16309
Views: 14,789

» […] We cross-validated Phoenix/WinNonlin and SAS many times. […] I love “push-the-button” statisticians reporting a 0.1% CV (‼) without hesitation. How plausible is that? […]
» Body height can be measured pretty precisely. Ask the worker whether he/she thinks that repeated measurements can be done to ±1/16″. If the answer is yes, ask which variability he/she expects in AUFC.

Yes; we are still in 1/16" units here. They are difficult to work with. It is highly unlikely for 0.1% to be correct. Sometimes people will believe what they find to be the most favorable. I will be finding out more soon about the other data. Meanwhile I wonder if Pharsight can come up with a SAS comparison.

Meanwhile I am off to visit a German store "Aldi"


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,302 posts in 4,102 threads, 1,317 registered users;
online 9 (2 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).

Restlessness is discontent –
and discontent is the first necessity of progress.
Show me a thoroughly satisfied man –
and I will show you a failure.    Thomas Alva Edison

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5