High CV? [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-05-03 23:07 (2886 d 13:48 ago) – Posting: # 16276
Views: 7,163

Dear Helmut,

❝ Adding to Detlew’s wise words: For a CVwR of 54% I would expect no inflation of the TIE with the FDA’s RSABE and practically none with the EMA’s ABEL.


where did this CVwR you mention came from? I couldn't detect such a number in this thread. Did you use a crystal ball [image] to figure it out in M.tareq's post? Or do you have some insider information?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
120 visitors (0 registered, 120 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:56 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5