Bioequivalence study [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-03 19:44 (3245 d 01:29 ago) – Posting: # 16274
Views: 8,910

Dear Detlew,

❝ To be not bounded by an document called "GUIDELINE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE" in his assessment? :-D


Nope. The guess of nobody above was correct. Let me highlight the relevant part:
"GUIDELINE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE"
We are performing a comparative bioavailability study (the experiment) and are hoping for bioequivalence (the desired result).
The assessor describes his hobby like this: “If you already know the result (bioequivalence) why do you want to perform a study?” ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:13 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5