Bioequivalence study [Design Issues]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-05-03 17:50 (3245 d 03:36 ago) – Posting: # 16272
Views: 8,786

Hi Helmut,

❝ I know one European assessor who rejects protocols containing the word bioequivalence in its title. Yes, even if it is a study of IR vs. IR.


❝ Homework: Why does he do so?


To be not bounded by an document called "GUIDELINE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE" in his assessment? :-D

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
20 visitors (0 registered, 20 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:26 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5