Bioequivalence study? [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2016-05-03 16:07 (3245 d 04:08 ago) – Posting: # 16269
Views: 8,840

❝ I know one European assessor who rejects protocols containing the word bioequivalence in its title. Yes, even if it is a study of IR vs. IR.


Guy with "comparative bioavailability" hobby? :-D

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,669 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:15 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5