Bioequivalence study? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-03 13:55 (3210 d 22:13 ago) – Posting: # 16267
Views: 8,884

Hi Pravin,

I know one European assessor who rejects protocols containing the word bioequivalence in its title. Yes, even if it is a study of IR vs. IR.

Homework: Why does he do so?
Bonus question: Why is he right?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,381 posts in 4,914 threads, 1,662 registered users;
70 visitors (0 registered, 70 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones.
But a collection of facts is no more a science
than a heap of stones is a house.    Henri Poincaré

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5