Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Which “target regulation”?

Which “target regulation”? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2016-04-27 11:15 (3354 d 00:44 ago) – Posting: # 16245
Views: 7,970

❝ Fascinating that an increase of AUC by ~80% was judged Down Under to be not substantial…

It's originator, stupid! ;-)

;-)

Things are somewhat different in the non-generic world.

—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Bioequivalence study of Sofosbuvir Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-18 12:34 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Which “target regulation”? Helmut 2016-03-18 14:23
  - Bioequivalence study of Sofosbuvir Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-19 10:59
    - No “WHO regulation”! Helmut 2016-03-19 18:03
      - No “WHO regulation”! Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-22 04:51
        
        Science ≠ truth ∧ regulations ≠ science Helmut 2016-03-22 14:06
  - Which “target regulation”?nobody 2016-04-27 09:15

Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,684 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do. Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz