Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Which “target regulation”? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2016-04-27 09:15 (1977 d 23:55 ago) – Posting: # 16245
Views: 6,188

» Fascinating that an increase of AUC by ~80% was judged Down Under to be not substantial…

It's originator, stupid! ;-)

Things are somewhat different in the non-generic world.

—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Bioequivalence study of Sofosbuvir Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-18 12:34 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Which “target regulation”? Helmut 2016-03-18 14:23
  - Bioequivalence study of Sofosbuvir Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-19 10:59
    - No “WHO regulation”! Helmut 2016-03-19 18:03
      - No “WHO regulation”! Dr Naghma Hashmi 2016-03-22 04:51
        
        Science ≠ truth ∧ regulations ≠ science Helmut 2016-03-22 14:06
  - Which “target regulation”?nobody 2016-04-27 09:15

Admin contact
21,700 posts in 4,538 threads, 1,542 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 09:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable. Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz