Which “target regulation”? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2016-04-27 11:15 (3710 d 09:16 ago) – Posting: # 16245
Views: 9,205

❝ Fascinating that an increase of AUC by ~80% was judged Down Under to be not substantial


It's originator, stupid! ;-) Things are somewhat different in the non-generic world.

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5