Which “target regulation”? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2016-04-27 09:15 (1639 d 05:02 ago) – Posting: # 16245
Views: 5,831

» Fascinating that an increase of AUC by ~80% was judged Down Under to be not substantial

It's originator, stupid! ;-) Things are somewhat different in the non-generic world.

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,176 posts in 4,413 threads, 1,475 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 14:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is not so much that I have confidence in scientists being right,
but that I have so much in nonscientists being wrong.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5