To whom it may concern [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-03-07 11:41 (2272 d 05:14 ago) – Posting: # 16064
Views: 8,433

Dear ElMaestro,

you are totally right IMHO.
The reason why statisticians (some of) are accepting simulations only for type II error are the different roles of power and type I error.

Ideal statistical tests meet the rule that type I error is <=0.05 or some other threshold agreed upon. Using simulations to determine this has the drawback that you only can show this for the scenarios you have simulated. Not for the general case. Therefore a proof assuring no alpha-inflation is preferred.

Power on the other hand is useful for planning purposes (only). No strict criterion has to be applied to this term in general.



Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,108 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz