Rotten or not rotten ? [Off Topic]

posted by nobody – 2016-02-27 11:56 (3269 d 17:21 ago) – Posting: # 16036
Views: 41,029

The story would be more impressing if the data were available. I don't buy this without all the data, sorry. It is very interesting to read in one of the early press releases that everything was OK with the approval/oversight of this trial.

While everybody in this field who has done first in man simply shakes head about such toxicity not found in the preclinical assessment. If that was really the case then we have a black swan here and then it would be absolutely crucial to make all data available in the public domain.

This stinks. Errors have been made. What we see now is the usual cover-up.

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,665 registered users;
144 visitors (0 registered, 144 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:18 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5