Log in
RegisterRRT|RTR|TRR? [Study Performance]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2016-02-16 15:19 (2985 d 17:30 ago) – Posting: # 15998
Views: 6,090
Hi Dan,
the forum’s jury is still out and we are awaiting its verdict how to deal with the partial replicate design (RRT | RTR | TRR). If a subject drops out after the second period in the sequence RRT I (!) would still include him / her in the estimation of CVwR. More data = better estimate.
the forum’s jury is still out and we are awaiting its verdict how to deal with the partial replicate design (RRT | RTR | TRR). If a subject drops out after the second period in the sequence RRT I (!) would still include him / her in the estimation of CVwR. More data = better estimate.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- volunteer exclusion Yura 2016-02-16 11:13
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- volunteer exclusion Dr_Dan 2016-02-16 14:12
- RRT|RTR|TRR?Helmut 2016-02-16 14:19
- RRT|RTR|TRR? Dr_Dan 2016-02-16 15:59
- RRT|RTR|TRR drop outs d_labes 2016-02-23 08:40
- volunteer exclusion Yura 2016-03-04 07:47
- RRT|RTR|TRR?Helmut 2016-02-16 14:19
- volunteer exclusion Dr_Dan 2016-02-16 14:12
Ing. Helmut Schütz