Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Trilogy? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Relaxation  – Germany, 2016-01-29 19:04 (3800 d 18:45 ago) – Posting: # 15893
Views: 10,541

❝ In the majority (!) of reports I have seen the interval used for estimating λ_z is not given.

Well, some big players in the industry have these always; I would assume the reason actually is the head of pharmacology there.
On the other hand, I haven't seen these in the majority of CRO reports, too. I would guess, the main reasons might be "These are of no use / Nobody does it" (I like that one!) or, in case of those people that have some knowledge in NCA, "Why should we make life easier for other people, if we do not have to" .
Arguments work also, when you try to present geometric means or ask for overlays in a publication .

Complete thread:

• Software validation Helmut 2016-01-28 20:03 [NCA / SHAM] 
  • Software validation ElMaestro 2016-01-28 22:33
    • Software validation nobody 2016-01-29 08:16
      • Software validation Shuanghe 2016-01-29 11:08
        • Trilogy? Helmut 2016-01-29 13:31
          • Trilogy?Relaxation 2016-01-29 18:04
            • Trilogy? Helmut 2016-01-29 18:51
      • Software validation ElMaestro 2016-01-29 11:20
  • Software validation jag009 2016-01-29 22:46