Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Software validation [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2016-01-28 23:33 (3804 d 21:18 ago) – Posting: # 15887
Views: 10,757

Hi Hötzi,

someone should push the mental Ctrl+Alt+Del buttons and pull the plug on Sauter et al. and instead publish some independent reference datasets... I have recollection of three weirdos doing something like that recently in relation to some other bioequivalence topic that was difficult to handle...

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Software validation Helmut 2016-01-28 20:03 [NCA / SHAM]
- Software validationElMaestro 2016-01-28 22:33
  - Software validation nobody 2016-01-29 08:16
    - Software validation Shuanghe 2016-01-29 11:08
      - Trilogy? Helmut 2016-01-29 13:31
        
        Trilogy? Relaxation 2016-01-29 18:04
        
        Trilogy? Helmut 2016-01-29 18:51
    - Software validation ElMaestro 2016-01-29 11:20
- Software validation jag009 2016-01-29 22:46

Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
208 visitors (0 registered, 208 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas. Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz