UMP - uniformly more powerful test [Power / Sample Size]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-01-15 21:08 (3311 d 19:53 ago) – Posting: # 15834
Views: 11,621

Dear Helmut,

❝ Leaving the question open: Which is the most powerful test?


From the early days of (bio)equivalence tests there where some candidates:

Berger, Hsu
"Bioequivalence Trials, Intersection-Union Tests and Equivalence Confidence Sets"
Statist. Sci. Volume 11, Number 4 (1996), 283-319.

Hsu et al.
Confidence intervals associated with tests for bioequivalence
Biometrika (1994), 81,1 , pp. 103-14

Brown L.D., Hwang J.T.G. and Munk A.
An Unbiased Test for the Bioequivalence Problem
The Annals of Statistics 1997, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2345–2367

and some more of these sort of papers.

But unfortunately no one of these made it.

BTW: I dont think that I tell you news with that citations :cool:.


Count up: post 994

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,667 registered users;
217 visitors (0 registered, 217 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:01 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5