Validation? [Software]
❝ […] for most of the cases we are validating our methods and software tools based on regulatory's guideline data.
Not a particularly good idea. What’s written in GLs is not necessarily correct. F.i. the CVintra in Canada’s BE guidance example data set was wrong for decades. Not only the value, but also the formula. See this presentation about validation of software.
❝ The same we are doing for this ED50 calculation. We tried many tools but none of them match exactly or come too closer to guideline data result.
❝
❝ You have written that model is wrong, which model are you talking ? Is it mentioned in guideline ? OR any other ?
Since the FDA reported only Emax and ED50 on p.29 I used the simple model $$E=(E_\text{max}\times D)/(E_{50}+D)\tag{1}$$ The GL mentions on p.4 also the baseline model
$$E=E_0+(E_\text{max}\times D)/(E_{50}+D)\tag{2}$$ Let’s compare them (fitting mean data)
Emax ED50 E0 AIC
(1) 1.139 -39.764 – 47.85
(2) 1.183 -39.523 -0.449 49.85
❝ You have compared the results and there is difference also, our question is also the same if values are different compare to guideline than is it acceptable to use that tool ?
Which tool? I cannot imagine that you will be able to find any software which comes even close to the FDA’s results. Not by any chance the software vendor went out of business. In the same guidance the FDA asked for data submitted on a diskette without specifying details. 8", 5¼", 3½"? If you want to be fully compliant, visit the next waste disposal site and search for a floppy drive. You could also ask the FDA for a copy of the famous P-Pharm software.
❝ Finally do you have any preference for software to use for this calculation ?
Phoenix/NLME. In R: nls/nlme/lme4, though it is not that easy to guess suitable starting values and specify weighting schemes.
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-09 18:08 [Software]
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-10 02:09
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-10 17:34
- Emax and ED50: NLME SDavis 2015-12-15 11:50
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-29 15:49
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-29 17:46
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-29 18:04
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-29 19:36
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-30 14:43
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-30 14:56
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-30 15:19
- Validation?Helmut 2015-12-30 16:02
- Validation? gcpatel126 2015-12-30 17:47
- Validation? Helmut 2015-12-30 21:15
- Validation? gcpatel126 2015-12-31 07:06
- Validation? gcpatel126 2016-01-11 14:54
- EOD Helmut 2016-01-11 22:13
- Validation? gcpatel126 2016-01-11 14:54
- Validation? gcpatel126 2015-12-31 07:06
- Validation? Helmut 2015-12-30 21:15
- Validation? gcpatel126 2015-12-30 17:47
- Validation?Helmut 2015-12-30 16:02
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-30 15:19
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-30 14:56
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-30 14:43
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-29 19:36
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-29 18:04
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-29 17:46
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-29 15:49
- Emax and ED50: NLME SDavis 2015-12-15 11:50
- Emax and ED50: NLME gcpatel126 2015-12-10 17:34
- Emax and ED50: NLME Helmut 2015-12-10 02:09