Be creative! (#2) [General Statistics]
❝ ICH E3 states (and the famous letter from Center of Expertise dated 11.12.13 repeated it):
❝ 12.4.2 Evaluation of Each Laboratory Parameter
❝ The necessary evaluation of laboratory values must in part be determined by the results seen, but, in general, the following analyses should be provided. For each analysis, comparison of the treatment and control groups should be carried out, as appropriate, and as compatible with study size. In addition, normal laboratory ranges should be given for each analysis.
Should be. A comparison given the sample sizes in BE? Forget it. See again the Q&A(R1) to ICH E3 (remember this post?). It’s up to you to adapt the report according to the study’s needs.
❝ BTW I don't know what kind of analysis do the assessors like to see in CSR
May I ask: What’s the ominous “letter from Center of Expertise”?
❝ Even when I provided just graphs of changes without any analysis of changes I got no LoDs.
I always provide only the original pre- and post-study exams and summary statistics. No comparisons, no bloody shift tables, no graphs, nada.
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Statistical significance of lab parameters in BE-studies BE-proff 2015-12-20 18:57 [General Statistics]
- Nil Helmut 2015-12-20 19:16
- Nil BE-proff 2015-12-20 20:16
- lab tests at least twice mittyri 2015-12-21 00:24
- Be creative! (#2)Helmut 2015-12-21 01:09
- Creative Russian experts mittyri 2015-12-21 01:40
- Be creative! (#2)Helmut 2015-12-21 01:09
- lab tests at least twice mittyri 2015-12-21 00:24
- Nil BE-proff 2015-12-20 20:16
- Nil Helmut 2015-12-20 19:16