Different N's for different analytes [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-12-08 10:49 (3351 d 14:08 ago) – Posting: # 15708
Views: 3,339

Dear Dave,

I have seen such studies in the wild quite recently, targeted to EMA, where only a subgroup of subjects samples were analyzed for a second analyte.
Regulatory acceptance: Duno exactly. At least no deficiency letters w.r.t to this fact up to now. But usually only very rare feedback is given from sponsors back to CRO w.r.t. regulatory decisions.

To be on the save side consider going for a scientific advice beforehand.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,376 posts in 4,912 threads, 1,662 registered users;
228 visitors (0 registered, 228 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:57 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors
instead of establishing the truth.    Marie Curie

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5